Compliance checks

Beyond how well a requirement is written, there’s the question of whether it meets the verification rules your organization has set. traceunified evaluates those rules against the requirement, so gaps surface where you can see and fix them.

Checks defined by your organization

Compliance verification is driven by org-configured verification rules, not by a fixed rulebook that multiplies with every framework you select. Your organization defines the rules, and each one is one of three kinds:

• Traceability rules — links a record is expected to have (for example, a requirement that must be verified by a test)
• Workflow rules — states, transitions, or signatures a record is expected to have passed through
• Content rules — attributes or field content a record is expected to carry

Frameworks configured for the organization and attached to a project give those rules their context (see Project settings and the Compliance section), but the checks that run are the rules your organization has configured. Rule design is covered in Compliance verification.

Compliance verification on the record

Each requirement carries a compliance verification view that shows whether it currently passes the rules that apply to it. When everything’s in order you’ll see that all checks have passed; when something’s missing, the specific issues are listed so you know exactly what to address.

Why catch it early

A requirement that quietly fails a verification rule is expensive to fix once it’s approved, linked, and built upon. Seeing the gap next to the requirement, in plain terms, is what keeps a submission from turning into a remediation project.

From checks to evidence

Passing checks aren’t just a green light; they’re part of the evidence your program accumulates. The compliance posture captured here feeds the verification, reporting, and evidence-export capabilities described in the Compliance and Reports sections, where per-record results roll up into the documents an auditor asks for.