Quality analysis

Quality analysis configures how the platform scores the quality of your records — the rules behind the quality signals described in Quality scoring. It’s where you decide what “well-written” means for your organization and have the system enforce it.

Enabling quality scoring

You turn on quality scoring and choose which rule categories are active. Rules span concerns like language — clarity, ambiguity, weak wording — and are grouped by priority, so you can treat some issues as high-priority problems and others as gentle suggestions. Activating the right categories tunes scoring to what your process cares about.

Custom rules

Beyond the built-in checks, you can define custom rules of your own, with their own rule type and priority — encoding house style or domain-specific expectations the standard rules don’t cover. Where custom rules aren’t needed, they can be left disabled. This lets quality scoring reflect your organization’s actual writing standards rather than a generic notion of quality.

Consistent, objective quality

Because the rules are configured centrally and applied uniformly, every record is scored against the same standard — so quality is an objective, comparable signal rather than a matter of individual reviewer taste. This feeds the quality widgets on dashboards and the quality picture in compliance verification, giving you an organization-wide view of how sound your records are.